You can transfer your images in RAW format to DxO PhotoLab from the Lightroom catalogue, edit them, and then send. DxO PhotoLab’s workflow is integrated with Lightroom Classic. It comes with a small amount of optional cloud storage… just ignore it and continue using your own local storage. Exporting to a drive consists of creating files by applying the changes you made in the Customize tab, then saving them to the hard drive and folder of your choice. You’ll want the $9.99 monthly Photographer Plan that includes LR Classic and Photoshop. The newer model, now called Lightroom (some still mention CC) has more limited features (although more have been added over time), but is cloud-based. It used to be called LR CC Classic, but Adobe dropped the CC (creative cloud) reference. Apologise for being dim.Īs noted, LR Classic is the old model, updated with better controls. Yes its a extra step that takes time, but the masking and file management in. I find this all very confusing and Adobe do not make it easy. Photo Lab 6 is great but i do personally prefer Lightroom Classic + DxO PureRaw. I thought Lightroom CC was the fully cloud based version. I understood that the only cloud connection was for updates, not forced storage. I had come to the conclusion that I need Lightroom classic. I have decided to accept subscription as I do not wish to learn another editor. *And once in a blue moon, for a variety of reasons, I use other raw conversion software: Sony Image Data Converter, RawTherapee, Phase One Capture One Express, and Konica Minolta DiMage Master Lite, and I've briefly experimented with a few others.Agreed the tread has strayed, often happens. If yours is actually on 6.1, then I suggest you update it. Also, LR 6's Print module is far ahead of DxO's printing capability-although about a year ago I got Qimage Ultimate and now I much prefer to use that for almost all photo printing.įWIW, the last perpetual-license version of LR is 6.14. So why do I still use LR 6? For raw conversion, mainly because it will process the DNG raw files from my Samsung Galaxy S7 phone but DxO will not, and the same for the DNG raw files from my Canon compacts using the CHDK firmware hack. I also subjectively like the DxO controls and workflow better than the LR controls and workflow. I also feel that PL 4 is far ahead of LR 6 in other important areas, like power / flexibility of color adjustment controls. IME DxO PhotoLab 4 Elite is simply technically better than Adobe Lightroom 6 in several ways, noise reduction and profiled lens corrections being two of the biggest ones. When Lightroom 7 was available only by subscription, I stopped upgrading LR. I've upgraded to each new DxO version (six major-version upgrades), and I upgraded from Lightroom 5 to Lightroom 6. Today I use both DxO PhotoLab 4 Elite and Adobe Lightroom 6.* For a few years I used in parallel the then-current DxO and Adobe products, starting with DxO Optics Pro 9 and Adobe Lightroom 5. Others software versus the original LR that might make measurable step-function change improvements? DxO PhotoLab 4 vs Adobe Lightroom: which is best for noise reduction - Amateur Photographer APS-C vs full-frame which sensor size is best Advertisement When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Main area of specific interest is probably more geared around MFT but I also shoot FF too and obviously would have applicability there I assume.īefore I download the trial version and spend a lot of time pixel peeping and comparing, testing functionality, just hoped to get a sample perspective of how materially different, better and worse DxO is to it. However, I do wonder about alternative editing software like DxO PhotoLab 4 and in particular whether any key features like their promoted "DENOISING AND DEMOSAICING" features are materially better than the what is available in the noise reduction features of LR 6.1. Believe I am fairly proficient with getting most out of the older version of LR. I have used and been reasonably happy with Lightroom and never felt I really wanted or could afford a subscription based service (I know there is a whole debate about 'value' of the subscription service), but putting that to the side, wanted to discuss the captioned. Appreciate perspectives from people that may have used both.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |